Harold Wilson: The Winner

Product Information

He won 4 lost 1 elections but arguably his unwillingness to pay attention to what was happening in the LP and TUs contributed to Labour losing the next 4. As Jim Tomlinson points out in his piece, this narrative has ‘distorted our understanding of much of post-war British economic history and policy’ (p. In this riveting and very readable biography, Thomas-Symonds con firms that Wilson's governments created a kinder, fairer, and forward-thinking Britain. But, at least by the 1970s, both East and West envisioned a conventional phase in their war planning. By using the Web site, you confirm that you have read, understood, and agreed to be bound by the Terms and Conditions.

In this account, Wilson's concern for the poor, his disgust at racial intolerance and his belief that the prosperity of Britain would best be protected in a European Common Market are the enduring aims of his political life. He also has a fine eye for the funny, strange details that bring accounts like this to life – from Wilson’s PPS, a former electrician, debugging his room for him on ministerial trips to the Soviet Union, to the then Prime Minister’s insistence on having backbench MP Eric Moonman attend a Downing Street dinner given in honour of NASA’s Apollo 11 crew shortly after the moon landing in 1969. Being an “Oxford don” at 21 is an achievement but is not all that unusual, despite much press coverage of Wilson that (incorrectly) implied that a don position was tantamount to a full professorship. And yet despite this litany of achievements, Wilson never troubles the upper reaches of polls ranking the British premiers ’s of the 20th century.This challenge to historical orthodoxy makes this book an important one for scholars of British political history and indeed a broader non-academic readership. p. 179: Economic planning and incomes policy were more distinct notions than is implied here, though in practice George Brown promoted both in Wilson’s government.

One of the earlier books also noted that when another Wilson claim (of a plot to overthrow his government) was partially corroborated by disclosures associated with the Peter Wright Spycatcher events of the 1980s, one newspaper headline that appeared was "How Wilson Was Proved Wright. The problem was however, that the unions were not particularly interested in being social partners or instruments of government. Party politics is often a squalid business and, as Thomas-Symonds says in one of his episodic attempts to put his central character in a kinder light, no amount of hindsight can help one disentangle advantage-seeking from expediency and the laudable desire for party unity. Inscribed by Wilson to the title page: "For Richard Dalby Harold Wilson", the recipient being the notable bibliophile of that name, and, as with many books from Dalby's library, this one comes with some bonus ephemera tucked into the rear of the book, in this case several leaflets on the subject of the 1974 referendum on Britain's future relationship with Europe, as well as a number of press cuttings.Nevertheless, the Labour Party won a slender majority at the 1964 election and Wilson became prime minister.

Wilson took his place in British history as the prime minister who deserted his friends and abandoned his principles. This books aims to describe how the parliamentary system of Britain works and identifying the essential differences of other presidential systems such as that of the United Sates. To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average.The previously alluded to output of diaries with regards to the Wilson era tends to lay the stress on the day to day battles that ministers engaged in over economic issues; as a result the liberalisation of Britain that occurred under Wilson has been overlooked in many accounts of his governments.

This current collection of essays, issued in the centenary of Wilson’s birth, is intended to conduct a reappraisal of Wilson’s reputation. Harold Wilson is the only post-war leader of any party to serve as Britain’s Prime Minister on two separate occasions. It should also be noted, however, that the Austen Morgan biography is a full-length one, containing source notes for example, and appeared before the other two. These authors mull over the fraught Wilson years and revive a deserved admiration for the man who ushered in an era of radical social reform in difficult times.He was one of the longest-serving premiers of the twentieth century, having won a staggering four general elections, yet, despite this monumental record, his place in Labour’s history remains somewhat ambiguous. Thomas-Symonds, in detailing Wilson’s handling of a variety of events, would seem to draw implicit comparison with later politicians fumbling their handling of similar situations. As an attempt to rehabilitate Wilson, this collection might be considered a failure; but it does leave us with a more sympathetic portrait of him than some readers will have started with.